malcolmgrimston.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the malcolmgrimston.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host malcolmgrimston.com. Currently, hosted in - and its service provider is - .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

customize - theme options) -- malcolm grimston working hard for west hill ward home about – malcolm grimston search for: recent posts the council election – a fascinating and humbling experience election q&a a few comments from residents… the council election – my ‘manifesto’ more reflections on grenfell recent comments malcolm grimston on about – malcolm grimston malcolm grimston on about – malcolm grimston david walker on about – malcolm grimston mrs rita kelly on about – malcolm grimston peter gregory on election q&a archives may 2018 april 2018 february 2018 november 2017 october 2017 june 2017 february 2017 december 2016 november 2016 january 2016 october 2015 august 2015 january 2015 october 2014 september 2014 august 2014 july 2014 categories energy media politics uncategorized west hill ward meta log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.org your street inner park road may 5, 2018 august 2, 2018 by malcolm grimston the council election – a fascinating and humbling experience uncategorized leave a comment you can see the full election result at http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/info/200327/election_results/2327/2018_borough_council_election_results_-_3_may/20 but in a nutshell west hill ward elected two labour councillors, angela ireland and peter carpenter, and me. by giving me 4,002 votes (out of a total 6,000 cast in the ward), by some way the highest total of any candidate on the night (actually i understand the largest vote in the history of wandsworth borough council except for 2010 when there was a high turnout because of the general election on the same day), i believe we delivered powerful message to both of the political parties – that we do expect more of our representatives than three and a half years of silence and a (frankly rather ‘project fear’) blitz campaign. every year i will be asking for an official statement about the numbers of questions all 60 councillors have asked on behalf of their residents as it was a bit of an eye-opener when my former independent colleague james cousins asked that question this year. it will also give you the information to hold me and other new councillors to account. the council is now made up of 33 conservatives, 26 labour and me. the other thing that i really liked was the fact that our turnout was greater than 50% (51.2%) which i think was the highest in the borough. sadly these days in local elections it is extremely rare for more than half of those eligible to vote actually to do so – i hope others will notice that when residents and councillors work together on issues people will come out to vote and engage in our democratic process. the new councillors i would like to congratulate angela and peter for their election to the ward. i have known both of them for some time. angela has been a very effective chair of the edgecombe hall residents’ association and we have worked together on a number of issues, not least recently on the proposed imposition of sprinklers in all rooms of 10+ storey council blocks. peter has represented roehampton and putney heath ward for eight years and is an intelligent man with a particular interest in council finances. i am looking forward to working with them both. a special word for nobuco hara – it is always difficult to be the one who misses out in these circumstances and i know from the positive comments i heard after the hustings at the gardens tennis club a couple of weeks ago that she was well thought of and brought a new perspective to local issues. the campaign i thought that all the candidates fought a robust and effective campaign and i am sure any of them would have made highly effective councillors. anyone who offers themselves for public office has my respect. i have asked all the labour and conservative candidates (and will extend the invitation to the liberal democrats and the greens, though it is probably fair to say that they were not quite so high profile in the campaign) if we could sit down together and share our thoughts as to what we have learned about the ward over recent weeks. it always seems to me a shame that the candidates in an election, as a group, pick up a huge amount of knowledge about what is going on but it is hardly ever captured and acted upon. i am delighted that alison rodwell, salvatore murtas and robert hughes have accepted as have the new councillors and nobuco. april 24, 2018 by malcolm grimston election q&a politics , west hill ward 1 comment question and answer you’ve asked me a few questions during the campaign which i’d like to offer my thoughts on. q you are the only councillor we ever seem to hear of or hear from – are we missing something? a no. the council has published the number of questions the 60 councillors raised on behalf of local residents between october 2015 and september 2017 – basically the middle half of the 2014-2018 council. the two west hill councillors between them raised 23 questions on behalf of local residents – and took home over £42,000 in allowances for their troubles. this works out at over £1,800 per resident they tried to help. incidentally i gather they got no criticism for the party leadership for this. one of the candidates for another party who is currently a councillor in another ward did fewer than one case per week. it is not as though there is nothing needs doing in west hill – in the same period i did over 2,500 bits of local casework on matters raised with me by your good selves or which i have seen during my walkabouts or in response to my newsletters. q are wandsworth services really as good as some people would have us believe – that is not what i see when i look at the potholes, the litter and so on? a wandsworth is a ‘failing’ council. fifteen years ago wandsworth was one of the top councils in the country – judged 4* (‘excellent’) for education, for social services and for overall standard of services. but, using the same criteria as were applied in those days, wandsworth is now a 1* council. for over two years wandsworth children’s services have been failing to look after our most vulnerable youngsters and has needed outside intervention. we have the highest proportion of adult care homes requiring improvement of any sw london borough – ranked 21 st out of 32 in london. we are the sixth worst authority in the country for recycling – a pathetic 21.9%. of course like every council we do some things well too: our schools are excellent, for example. (i was at southmead primary last week talking about local history – i had the pleasure of doing the same at ronald ross and our lady queen of heaven recently. what a great bunch of kids and teachers we have!) but even here many schools have had to appeal to parents for extra funds while st cecilia’s now only does sport once a fortnight because budget cuts mean they can’t afford the staff. overall we are not meeting the standard set by our neighbouring councils. q do failing children’s services or relatively low-standard care homes really matter to this council? a apparently not – how often have you any reference to putting these matters right in the pile of literature coming through your letterboxes? i have been sitting on the improvement board that the government has imposed on wandsworth until we start looking after our children properly for the last two years and have managed to improve the quality of information being used but the lack of resources being made available is very depressing. it is simply not a priority. q are you really ‘independent’? a yes. over the last years i have voted with labour and conservatives (most things that come before council are agreed by all parties); with the conservatives against labour; with labour against the conservatives; and against both conservative and labour. the reason i am independent is that i want to vote in favour of what i believe is the right thing, not what the party tells me i have to think. so for example i voted against turning battersea park into a racetrack (th

URL analysis for malcolmgrimston.com

http://malcolmgrimston.com/2015/01/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/tag/inner-park-road/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/2018/04/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/politics/what-you-are-saying-about-me/#respond
http://malcolmgrimston.com/uncategorized/a-little-bit-of-history-1/#respond
http://malcolmgrimston.com/2016/01/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/2014/08/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/politics/rewriting-history/#respond
http://malcolmgrimston.com/uncategorized/grenfell-house/#respond
http://malcolmgrimston.com/energy/what-can-nuclear-power-learn-from-brexit/#respond
http://malcolmgrimston.com/politics/what-you-are-saying-about-me/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/category/politics/west-hill-ward/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/energy/what-can-nuclear-power-learn-from-brexit/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/2017/11/
http://malcolmgrimston.com/2016/11/
telegraph.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
wandsworth.gov.uk
independent.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: MALCOLMGRIMSTON.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1868846786_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2016-07-22T04:11:57Z
Creation Date: 2014-07-29T13:24:40Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-07-29T13:24:40Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.TSOHOST.CO.UK
Name Server: NS2.TSOHOST.CO.UK
Name Server: NS3.TSOHOST.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-04-17T18:05:49Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =malcolmgrimston.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME malcolmgrimston.com

  CHANGED 2016-07-22

  CREATED 2014-07-29

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.TSOHOST.CO.UK 195.62.28.14

  NS2.TSOHOST.CO.UK 95.142.155.4

  NS3.TSOHOST.CO.UK 95.142.154.15

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .